Conclave live: black smoke emerges from chimney as cardinals fail to agree on new pope


We’re back for afternoon votes

Jakub Krupa

Jakub Krupa

The cardinals were expected to be back in the Sistine Chapel at 4.30pm local time, and we understand that they have just gone in.

So the fourth vote should be now getting under way any moment now.

The next possible smoke would be probably around 5.30pm local time, but we only if they elected a pope.

That’s the round in which Benedict XVI was elected in 2005.

Otherwise, we will have to wait until the fifth round is done, around 7pm, when we will get a smoke signal, whatever the result.

But keep in mind that all these timings are purely for guidance: it may be earlier, may be later, and it’s only up to the 133 cardinals to decide the timings.

I know, not very helpful. But I don’t make the rules!

Share

Updated at 

Key events

The factions lobbying to shape the conclave

Harriet Sherwood

Harriet Sherwood

There are thought to be a number of different factions seeking to shape the outcome of the conclave. Broadly speaking, they can be characterised as progressives, conservatives, unifiers and the Italian contingent.

Those involved in lobbying – including cardinal electors and cardinals ineligible to take part in the conclave as they are 80 or older – are hoping to sway newer, less experienced cardinals. About 80% of the 133 cardinal electors have not taken part in a conclave before; 21 were appointed just four months before Francis’s death. Some believe this means there is everything to play for.

The progressives include those who want to preserve Francis’s legacy and push forward on his priorities. Issues such as inequality, marginalisation, the climate crisis and migration are important. They also want more lay people, including women, appointed to important Vatican positions; an orientation on the global south, where the Roman Catholic church is seeing its greatest growth; and an emphasis on a “poor church for the poor” rather than the pomp and rituals beloved of the traditionalists.

You can read the full piece here:



Source link